Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics
Green Publication follows the principles and best practices defined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The journal is committed to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and preventing publication malpractice.
All manuscripts undergo a double-blind peer review process to ensure fairness, objectivity, and academic integrity. Reviews are assigned only to suitably qualified editors and reviewers.
Authorship and Contributorship
Authorship is limited to individuals who have made significant contributions to the study. All contributors meeting authorship criteria must be listed, and any changes require written consent from all authors.
Manuscript Handling
Manuscripts are evaluated for originality, relevance, and ethical compliance. Editors may request revisions or reject manuscripts based on reviewer recommendations.
Post-Publication Corrections
Corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern are issued in accordance with COPE guidelines when necessary.
Complaints and Appeals
Authors may appeal editorial decisions by submitting a written justification to the Editor-in-Chief. All appeals are reviewed transparently.
Plagiarism and Misconduct
Plagiarism, data fabrication, and redundant publication are serious violations. Confirmed misconduct may result in rejection or retraction.
Special Issues
Special Issues are approved by the Editor-in-Chief and subject to the same ethical and peer review standards as regular issues.
